1
1.) Roads
are everywhere.
"There is no spot in the lower 48 of
the United States more than 22 miles from the nearest road, outside of some
unbuildable swampland in southern Louisiana" (Seiler, p.6).
To me, the essence of "wild" places
is a sense of isolation. Given that you can't go more than 22 miles without
hitting a road, how isolated can any one place be? It really makes the world
seem small. If you find someplace that seems wild, you know it is not bounded
by an ocean or a continent, but merely a road, which is probably only just out
of sight.
2.) The roadways are authoritarian.
"The increase in levels and
vantages of surveillance... in public space and the suspension of various
rights to mobile privacy... are symptoms, perhaps, of the republic of drivers'
evolution" (Lutz, p.151).
We take for granted that the
roadways are authoritarian. We just accept police "checkpoints" as
part of the road experience. Furthermore, this road authority primarily
threatens us with monetary penalties, such as fines. Somehow, it is natural
that we could get a speeding ticket at any time. Really, being on the road is
the primary place I encounter law enforcement. On the roads, I'm not in public
space, I'm in police space.
3
3.) We
are remarkably unaware of a majority of the components that make our
car-centered culture work.
"With remarkable near invisibility,
the gas arrives at those stations via hundreds of thousands of miles of
pipeline, and a vast fleet of tanker trucks supply the roads daily to make
delivery" (Lutz, p.5).
Sure, drilling for oil is bad, and so is
spilling it in the ocean, not to mention burning it. But, most people don't
even know the half of what it means to be so dependent upon gasoline. We don't
even think of the carbon footprint of the trucks that transport that fuel. We
don't think about the materials, the right of way issues, the cost or the
unsightliness of those gas pipelines. Most of our culture of automobility is
neatly tucked away out of sight, and out of mind.
4
4.) We
don't buy cars with reason.
"We become attracted to a class of car
or a brand because of the 'soft' or emotional appeal of its marketed image;
then we use the hard information available to us not to evaluate or test our
decision to buy that brand but to rationalize it" (Lutz, p.41)
We are seduced into somehow letting our
cars be mediums for our own personal values. We buy sports cars because we want
to portray ourselves as cool or wealthy, not because we want good gas mileage.
Then, we tell ourselves that it's ok that the Corvette doesn't get great
mileage, because it sure does have a lot of horsepower, and those are the
sacrifices you need to make for torque. Interestingly, the values we try to
portray through our cars, such as vanity, are often frivolous. We are sold not
on practicality, but rather on romanticism.
5
5.) We
equate mobility with personal freedom.
"Mobility is ostensibly a universal
right" and "it's true goal is not mobility as such; it is access to
people and facilities" (Seiler, p.26).
By mobility, we really mean our ability for
autonomy. You are not free if you are not mobile. Almost by definition, if you
can't move, you are stuck, and stuck is the opposite of free. Our society is
highly mobile, because almost everyone has access to a car- that is, to a
greater capacity for freedom. If we had great public transportation, but little
access to cars, we would not say we are so mobile, as we would have less
autonomy. We would not consider ourselves very mobile if we could only travel
at the mercy of bus and train schedules and routes.
6.) Our
car-centric system of values dictates how we view the actions of others.
"Perhaps they are ashamed to put in a
garden- afraid the neighbors might take it as a sign that they are too poor to
go to the supermarket" (Kunstler, p.249).
In our car-centric society, not being able
to drive is seen as a sign of being lower class, and is coupled to our idea of
mobility as freedom. The higher class you are, the more freedom you have. Not
being able to go to the store is to have less freedom, because you have less
ability to move autonomously. We don't even think to value the fact that
growing your own food is a great display of autonomy, itself necessarily an
example of freedom.
7
7.) We
settle for vanity over substance.
"Whatever their purpose- motel,
casino,... pizza emporium... they were all just cinder-block sheds, and rather
pathetic amid the sprawl. What mattered were the signs attached to them and how
dazzling it all looked at night" (Kunstler, p.82)
Everything
is about catching attention, but not necessarily holding on to it.
Because we value
mobility so much, we are always on the move. And because we are always on the
move, it isn't necessary for things to be substantive, because we only interact
with them a short time. These places, motels, casinos, pizza joints, are all
just stops, they aren't destinations. The problem is that we start to value
these things more, though they actually have less substantive value, because
they bolster our ability to be mobile. Because such places give us more
mobility, we are replacing our towns, which have a vibe of permanence, with "strips" of places which
not only allow us to be mobile, they require it.
8
8.) Instead
of improving drivers, we try to make all their behavior survivable.
"One of the problems with cars is that
all drivers are not highly skilled- often they are even drunk- and accidents
happen. So to remove some of the danger that drivers pose, highway engineers
have developed a standard perfect modern suburban street... at least thirty-six
feet wide- same as a county highway" (Kunstler, p.49-50)
Cars are necessary for everyday life in
this age. Not having a car is tantamount to being a lower-class citizen. Since
everyone depends on cars, it would create a huge hassle if only a minority of
them could actually operate vehicles. Therefore, we let just about anyone
drive, so long as they can afford to. Instead of making it harder to get a
license, or requiring more training, we simply make roads which can better
accommodate less-skilled drivers. Our value of personal freedom is shockingly
higher than that of personal safety.
9.) Despite
viewing mobility as freedom, and having great opportunities for mobility, we
are no happier for it.
"Importantly, people with longer
commutes report 'lower satisfaction with life' than those with short commutes-
that is, they are simply less happy. These commuters' spouses are also
unhappy" (Lutz, p.165).
Despite
how much we value mobility and freedom, driving just doesn't make
us
happier. I think this is precisely because everyday life now requires us to
drive.
Because we are losing our towns to strips of flashy convince- based
businesses,
we have to deal with the roadways and their many inconviences.
We
can't just go to the corner store, we have to drive out in traffic to places
not
connected with anything. Perhaps the reality of mobility isn't freedom at
all.
10.) Cars aren't
at the root of the problem, we are.
"Bob Yaro, since departed from
his new job with the NYRPA, offered this final assessment in a phone interview:
'When they come to chronicle the decline of this civilization,' he said,
'they're going to wonder why were debating flag burning, abortion, and broccoli
eating instead of the fundamental issues of how we live and use the environment"
(Kunstler, p.267).
"Henceforth I ask not good-fortune—I
myself am good fortune...
(Still here I carry my old delicious
burdens;
I carry them, men and women—I carry them
with me wherever I go;
I swear it is impossible for me to get rid
of them;
I am fill’d with them, and I will fill them
in return.)"
-Walt Whitman, "Song of the Open Road"
It is not about cars or the impact that their
use had. It is about what we did as people. The problems of automobility exist
only as long as we continue to perpetuate them. Any problem with cars or
automobility is really a problem with ourselves, as cars exist only so long as
we continue to make and use them. I have included a video of a klein bottle for
this last revelation to illustrate this point; how the problems of automobility
we see around ourselves start within ourselves.
No comments:
Post a Comment